City Council Won’t Seek Funding Increase for Bike Lanes

But electeds will ask the mayor for more sidewalk money.

Photo: David Sachs
Photo: David Sachs

Yesterday, Denver City Council members decided against a request for more bike lane funds from Mayor Michael Hancock, even though his proposed 2018 budget calls for funding levels that won’t complete the city’s planned bike network until 2042.

City Councilman Jolon Clark asked his colleagues to push for $3.5 million for bike lane installation, up from the $2.5 million proposed by Hancock. But the motion, which was decided by a quick show of hands, failed by one vote. Councilwoman Mary Beth Susman would have cast the decisive vote in favor of the funding increase, but she was absent. Susman gave her proxy vote to Clark, she told Streetsblog, but their colleagues would not let her have a voice without being physically present. She was attending a funeral.

That means bike lane funding will remain flat at $2.5 million for the third straight year if nothing changes between now and the budget’s final adoption later this month. Failing to increase the city’s support undermines the Council’s stated commitment to prioritize the build-out of the city’s bike plan, Denver Moves Bicycles [PDF].

Completing Denver’s planned bike network would take until 2042 at current funding levels, even if voters approve an addition $18 million for the plan included in the November bond measure, Clark said.

“We cannot seriously ask people to shift their mode and look at switching to a bicycle when our level of commitment to building out infrastructure for that is that far down the road,” Clark said.

On a brighter note, the Council will ask Hancock for an additional $2.5 million to build new sidewalks, restoring a line item from last year’s budget. If the mayor agrees, that would bring total funding for new sidewalks in this year’s budget to $4.4 million, on top of about $4 million to help low-income Denverites repair sidewalks.

Even so, the need for sidewalk construction is much larger. “The funding levels that we’re at now are just a shade above drop-in-the-bucket,” said City Councilman Paul Kashmann, who proposed the funding bump. To put things in perspective, WalkDenver estimates that it will cost $600 million to fill in sidewalk gaps and bring existing sidewalks up to snuff.

Some other transportation items that council members will ask Hancock to include in his budget document:

  • $333,000 for a “traffic demand management” study of how different incentives can change transportation behavior.
  • $195,000 to redesign the highway cloverleaf at Colfax and Federal as a more human-scale intersection.
  • $93,000 for a Safe Routes to School coordinator.
  • $60,000 for 10 displays that show drivers how fast they’re going and record data.

Council members also considered but in the end voted against asking for funds for the following:

  • $250,000 to study walking, biking, and transit improvements to South Colorado Bouleveard.
  • $250,000 to study walking, biking, and transit improvements around the Southmoor RTD station.

Hancock will submit his final budget to the City Council later this month for approval. The public will have a chance to weigh in at public hearings, so the goose isn’t cooked yet.

This article was updated to include Susman’s comments.

  • deadindenver

    Thanks for trying Jolon, but once again Denver proves the recent bicycle editorials true. Denver’s bike friendly image is just a bunch of PR poo.

  • TakeFive

    The problem with bicycle lanes is all those damn bollards… at least according to Anonymous Bob “they’re a nightmare.”

  • ecycled

    Anyone know the vote record for the additional bike lane funding, as in who for and against?

    • David Sachs

      This was not a formal vote. This was a “strategy session” (an informal meeting). Council staffer says there is no record of who voted for what — just the total. They voted on several things, one after the other, with raised hands, very quickly. I missed the “for” and “against” tally. There is also no video, like you would have for a committee meeting.

      • ecycled


  • ecycled

    And yes, thanks to Councilman Clark for the effort. Your efforts are duly noted.

    • Mr H

      Very disappointed in Susman – she’s better than a “no-show”. Sigh.


    Asking for 1/3 million for a “traffic demand management” meta study to learn how to convince people to use infra that doesn’t exist – but not asking for money for new infra. I mean, that’s hardcore. What a farce.

    Take note that the people who got paid plenty of Denver $$$ to consult about and design a scattering of new bike lanes downtown are the very same people who will get paid to produce a very sketchy ‘study’ to find the best marketing strategies to convince people to use facilities which supposedly were going to be so great that they would do their own convincing, just by being there.

    Oh and guess what??? Yeah, the strategies that will magically be promoted in this so-called study will happen to be strategies that will directly involve and enrich the same people who did the study. Wow! So amazing how that works. Just a big coincidence I guess.


  • nigel

    The number of people I see riding on the sidewalks NEXT TO a protected bike lane is high enough that it seems some education is needed. That or the police need to actually enforce the laws.



Thursday’s Headlines

Cars don’t have to press a button to cross the street, so why should pedestrians? CDOT prioritizes cars over bikes on the collapsed segment of U.S. 36. The Colorado Rockies ban scooter riding near Coors Field during games. More headlines ...