Shanghai Shows Why Denver Is Wise to Regulate Dockless Bike-Share

Dockless bike-share bicycles parked in Shanghai. Photo: Meghan McCloskey Boydston
Dockless bike-share bicycles parked in Shanghai. Photo: Meghan McCloskey Boydston
This column is part of Streetsblog Denver’s Summer Reader Takeover, where we give you a platform to talk urban transportation. The author’s views don’t necessarily reflect those of Streetsblog Denver.

Can dockless bike-share solve the challenge of getting more people out of their cars and onto bicycles?

Denver’s bike commuters comprise only 2.3 percent of the commuting population, so perhaps a bike-share that provides greater convenience could help encourage more Denverites to bike to work. The city’s xperimentation with dockless bike-share has been limited, but the city has recently adopted a pilot permit program with new regulations.

I was in Shangai this summer, where I saw an example of a city that has wholeheartedly adopted dockless bike-share. In some areas of the city, the bikes from dockless bike-share companies like MoBike and Ofo are on every corner and sidewalk. There are side streets where the bicycles are parked by the dozens, and pedestrians have difficulty passing. One expat I spoke to compared the influx of bikes to locusts, because they swarmed the city and took over the sidewalks.

In other areas of the city, there were no bikes to be found, indicating a lack of redistribution by the operators. Shanghai is apparently trying to diffuse the bike parking dilemma by creating markings on the sidewalk, designating where the bikes can be parked. Outside the city, illegally parked or abandoned bikes are impounded in massive lots nicknamed “bicycle graveyards.”

Despite the number of bikes in Shanghai, I didn’t see many bicyclists. Shanghai is very convenient to navigate by walking, transit, and driving, but bicycle infrastructure was lacking. Denver is wise to be cautious when allowing dockless bike-share companies to enter the city, because, like Shanghai, Denver has a long way to go in creating infrastructure that provides equitable and safe access for bikes.

Limiting the number of bikes in circulation and operators in Denver can help avoid bicycle graveyards and blocked sidewalks. Requiring operators to redistribute bikes will make the system more convenient, equitable, and user-friendly. Frustrations with a poorly managed bike-share could deter hesitant bicycle commuters, rather than encourage them to change their habits.

Bicycle commuting is one of the best ways to reduce pollution, improve health, and decrease traffic. With the correct regulations, Denver can leverage dockless bike-share to meet its goal of reducing single occupant vehicle commuter trips, while avoiding the pitfalls of Shanghai.

Meghan McCloskey Boydston lives in Capitol Hill.

  • Philicious5280

    Bike sharing is transit. Transit should not be a for profit enterprise where reliability and longevity rely on the whim of private enterprise whose only motive will be maximizing profit. Denver should own and tightly control the operation of its own bike sharing system. Ofo is already on the way out and many other for profit bike sharing operations are turning their focus to e-scooters. This will be a race to the bottom where Denver will be left with no bike sharing system, or at the very least a system that is poorly managed and unreliable, unless the hard choice to finally own the outcomes of commuter cycling is made by the city of Denver.

  • kyle

    @ Philicous5280 – we are approaching the bottom quickly. Scooters come back on Friday along with even more dockless bikes. The only action the city has taken to regulate it all is to put ownership of enforcement on the scooter and bike companies. Can’t wait to see all of the interesting places that these bikes and scooters end up. I’ve already witnessed them being dumped into Cherry Creek, storm drains and other places where they don’t belong. I’m an avid cyclist and I appreciate the B-Cycle program because it regulates where the bikes must be parked, so that they don’t clutter the sidewalks, roads, parks, alleys, dumpsters, rivers, etc. When given the option to choose where users want to leave the scooters and bikes, users generally don’t consider anyone else that might be impacted by the scooter/bike and dump them wherever they want. This is why B-Cycle has succeeded and why these dockless programs will fail. Users love to abuse it and Denver is completely “on-board” as long as they get a piece of the action and have access to the data that the companies are collecting about how often users travel, where they go and any demographic information they can get their hands on to turn a profit from marketing firms that will pay dearly from it. End result = more waste and clutter in an otherwise beautiful city because people generally can’t cope with having to be responsible for their actions – it’s easier to “not care” and let someone else deal with the mess, right?

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Today’s Headlines

|
CDOT “Artwashing” Aims to Placate Elyria Swansea Residents During I-70 Widening (Westword) As Neighbors Make Sidewalks Navigable for People in Wheelchairs, Keeping Flagstone a Costly Proposition (CPR) If You Ride the Bus or Train, 9News Wants Your Opinion for a Series on Transit Colorado Springs Installing Red Light Cameras in Attempt to Curb Traffic Violence […]