The Arrivo “End of Traffic” Video Looks a Lot Like 1956 General Motors Propaganda

A phony family sings the praises of traffic-free travel in a 1956 General Motors film imagining the future.
A phony family sings the praises of traffic-free travel in a 1956 General Motors film imagining the future.

Ever since Americans discovered car congestion, companies have been promising to make it go away.

General Motors’ 1939 World’s Fair exhibit, “Futurama,” famously claimed that people would be able to enjoy the freedom and comfort of their motor vehicles without the stress of clogged roads. Three generations later, the fantastic highways GM envisioned are clogged and Americans spend as much time behind the wheel as ever.

Have we learned anything in 80 years?

In 2017, Coloradans are hearing similar promises from Arrivo and Hyperloop One, two startups that the state government is welcoming with open arms. Their transport tech is a little different than what mid-century propagandists envisioned, but the idea is the same: You can still get around in personal vehicles, but The Future will solve congestion.

Here’s a comparison of the futurist road system imagined by GM in 1956 (in Technicolor!) and the one imagined by Arrivo, the company heralding “the end of traffic” by putting cars on a 200 mph conveyor belt.

First, the Arrivo advertisement:

“There was a time when I wasn’t my best,” a regretful voice says over b-roll of clogged, smoggy freeways. “I felt choked. Congested. I couldn’t breathe.”

In GM’s mid-century film, a nuclear family of four sits in their convertible, patriarch behind the wheel, stuck in traffic. He sings: “‘Til they bring the highways up to date, you can bet your high compression we’re gonna be late.”

Local, state, and federal governments have been bringing “the highways up to date” with expansion after expansion for 60 years. It hasn’t fixed the basic geometric problem: There are too many cars and not enough space for them in cities.

Arrivo won’t change geometry either, and shuttling personal vehicles from one place to another on its high-speed sleds won’t bring about “the end of traffic” as the company claims.

The ads are remarkably similar in other ways. From the promise of a sleek, yet-to-be-invented vehicle whirring down its own track without, miraculously, having to interact with other traffic…

Screen Shot 2017-12-01 at 10.22.12 AM

Screen Shot 2017-12-01 at 10.17.39 AM 1

…to the interior shots of people thoroughly enjoying themselves without wearing seat belts:

Screen Shot 2017-12-01 at 10.23.47 AM

Screen Shot 2017-12-01 at 10.14.20 AM

No matter how companies try to spin it, personal vehicles take up space. They did in 1956 and they do now.

There is no magic tech fix or cheat code that will unlock the secret to a world without congestion. What governments can do is invest in quality transit that moves more people in less space and build compact neighborhoods where people can safely and conveniently get around by walking and biking.

  • John Riecke

    Obviously the GM future is the better of the two. No one broke out into song in the Arrivo video.

  • TakeFive

    What governments can do is invest in quality transit

    In a representative democracy, “government” is no more, no less than the voters duly elected representatives. Within Colorado, with respect to local transit, voters are responsible for directly deciding what transit they want and how to fund it. To date, the state has avoided getting involved with ‘big city’ transit. I don’t see that changing w/o a boatload of more revenue. Ofc voters can change this if they wish.

    If one is interested in better transit in the Metro or City of Denver then worrying about Arrivo and Hyperloop One is a waste of time and oxygen. It’s like trying to swat a flea on an elephants ass.

    • TakeFive

      I also have a prediction. Within a couple of years Denver will discover that recurring expenses will be eating up a larger share of Denver’s General Fund. The growing cost for Public Safety will be a primary reason but not the only one.

      Consequently it will get harder and harder to find discretionary funds for transit and other multi-modal options. To get to where you want to go it will take someone with a Big Vision that can be sold to the voters. Or you can continue to blame the Mayor and see how far that gets you. In the meantime transit etc costs are reportedly going up and not by just a little bit.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Monday’s Headlines

|
Driver Hits Person Walking Near Coors Field, Causes Injury (Fox31) It’s Now the Second Time a Driver Has Hit a Light Rail Train at this Intersection (Fox31) Permanent Closures Along I-70 As Project Work is Underway (CBS) Police Place Full Blame on Person Walking, Who was Crossing Tracks Illegally, for Getting Hit and Killed by […]

Friday’s Headlines

|
Permanent Ramp Closures Underway for Central 70 Project (Fox31) The Latest Quarrel Between RTD and Denver Transit Partners (CPR) Third Best Biking City in the USA is -Drumroll Please- Fort Collins, Colorado (Coloradoan) Denver’s Soon-to-be Largest Industrial Park will be Served Only by Train (DBJ) Boulder City Council on Schedule To Look at Vision Zero […]