Kansas City Takes Its Sidewalk Network More Seriously Than Denver

Photo: Clay Harmon
Photo: Clay Harmon

One of the remaining points of contention in Denver’s transportation bond coming up in November is the amount of funding for sidewalks. Mayor Michael Hancock has recommended $30 million for the citywide sidewalk network. If we really wanted to make progress on the city’s patchwork pedestrian infrastructure, we’d be aiming a lot higher. Like as high as Kansas City.

Yep, Kansas City. In April, voters there said yes to an $800 million bond measure, with $600 million reserved for streets, sidewalks, and bridges. That amount trumps the $415.5 million currently allocated to transportation in Denver’s bond package.

But what stands out even more is Kansas City’s allocation to sidewalks: $150 million. Right now Denver’s project list [PDF] includes just $30.7 million dollars for sidewalks. So even though our population is 40 percent bigger than Kansas City’s, Denver is proposing to spend only one-fifth as much on walking infrastructure.

An earlier draft of Denver’s project list included more for citywide sidewalks and bikeways before an executive committee slashed those funding levels. Hancock did not restore that funding before sending his spending recommendations to the City Council for final approval.

It’s up to council members to decide whether they’ll restore the sidewalk funding to the $49 million originally recommended, or even add to it, given the giant gulf between what the city needs and what it has.

Denver is missing sidewalks on more than a quarter of its streets, and needs $600 million to close the gap. It’s important to remember that the city does not have a long-term policy to fund or implement sidewalks, either. So this one-time infusion could be it for a while.

Advocates are asking residents to contact council members and the mayor and ask them to restore funding to sidewalks (and bikeways) — and they’ve made it easy for you.

The City Council will continue deliberations on Monday.

  • TakeFive

    Just a guess that KC’s “sidewalk network” is in much worse shape than Denver’s? Crumbling sidewalks are more hazardous than no sidewalks.

    Not sure how important having a sidewalk race with Kansas City MO is but as always it stirred my curiosity. For starters it’s a 20-year plan. What piqued my curiosity even more is that they’ll only issue about $40 million in bonds per year. Turns out that in February Moody’s revised it’s Kansas City’s (MO) outlook to Negative while reaffirming an Aa2 GO Rating. By contrast Denver starting in 2010 has received the highest ratings from all three credit rating agencies. To be fair KC’s rating is still very solid.


Thursday’s Headlines

Yesterday members of the Colorado House Transportation Committee killed HB1099, a bill that would have banned automated traffic enforcement statewide, including photo red light cameras. Top photo: After a legislative victory, members of the Denver Streets Partnership posed for a photo outside of the State Capitol: Jack Todd and Piep van Heuven of Bicycle Colorado, Jill […]
Pullquote: Denver’s disappearing green spaces are not “because of a growing population of people. It’s because of a growing population of cars.” —Alana Miller, Frontier Group

Wednesday’s Headlines

From Streetsblog Fact check: Colo. Rep. Jovan Melton wants to ban red light cameras. But he justifies his position with false info. A hearing for his bill will happen at the State Capitol this afternoon. (Streetsblog Denver) Opinion: Denver paved over paradise and put up a parking lot. Contrary to the conclusion of a recent Denver […]
A parking lot across the street from Union Station, Denver's transit hub. Photo: David Sachs

Opinion: Denver Paved Over Paradise and Put up a Parking Lot

As the population grows, “nearly half the land in Denver’s city limits is now paved or built over,” shrinking the city's green space, according to a recent series in Denver Post. But there’s something important missing in their account. The city’s pavement problem isn’t because of a growing population of people. It’s because of a growing population of cars. It’s the roads, driveways and – perhaps most egregiously – the parking lots we’ve built to accommodate more cars.