Protesters Call for I-70 Re-Route Outside Hancock’s Inaugural Address

Protestors used today's mayoral inauguration to protest the I-70 expansion. Photo: David Sachs
Protestors against the I-70 widening outside today’s mayoral inauguration. Photo: David Sachs

Protesters took aim at the I-70 widening project and demanded transparency today outside the Ellie Caulkins Opera House where Mayor Michael Hancock was being sworn in for his second term.

Chanters belted protest songs and held signs reading “We can re-route I-70!” and “!Sí se Puede Desviar El I-70!”

Fran Frainaguirre lifted a sign up at the corner of 14th and Curtis. “I very deeply believe in sustainability and walkability and bikeability, and all those things for this city,” she said. “We cannot just keep widening highways. That’s not the solution to our traffic problems. I think we all have to learn to get around on public transportation. By putting that highway in, they’re going to take the walkability away from people there. Come into the 21st century.”

Meanwhile, at the inauguration inside, outgoing City Auditor Dennis Gallagher gave his seat up to Tim O’Brien, but not before handing Hancock a letter that said he wouldn’t sign a cost-sharing agreement between the city and the Colorado Department of Transportation for the highway expansion.

Opponents of the I-70 widening take issue with the city’s decision to fund a portion of it — $83 million in cash and waived fees. They warn that the highway expansion will induce more traffic and increase air pollution near Swansea Elementary School. Protesters like Bob May, who passed out fliers about the highway’s impending damage, want CDOT to re-route I-70 around the neighborhoods by connecting it with I-76 and I-270. CDOT isn’t interested in that idea.

Despite a lot of public meetings, May said, the Hancock administration hasn’t been candid about its intentions, failing to follow the proper procedures, and pursuing the highway expansion as a fait accompli. “At least the state should do the environmental impact statement for an alternative route,” May said, “but at public meetings they just flat out refuse to acknowledge it.”

We’ll have more about Hancock’s inaugural address in a later post.

  • OrangeFree

    The reroute:
    1) Is more expensive
    2) Will increase traffic times
    3) Is unwanted by the north metro communities.

    So, expanding highways in Denver bad, expanding highways in Commerce City good?

    Just keep complaining, re-routers. If you scare CDOT enough, they will just rebuild in place as is, and no body wins.

    • mckillio

      1. I don’t believe that it’s actually been proven that it will be more expensive, not to mention that the expansion requires a temporary reroute anyways.
      2. By about three minutes
      3. The number of people impacted by the reroute pales in comparison to the number that will be negatively impacted by the current expansion.

      • spr8364

        I understood that the construction will not require a temporary reroute. They will do it in phases like all the other recent highway widening projects.

  • neroden

    Is there any federal involvement? If so, there’s a valid NEPA lawsuit for failing to consider alternatives.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Wednesday’s Headlines

|
A-Line to DIA Will Be Closed For a Full 24 Hours This Weekend (DenPo) City Council Passed the Budget for 2019 Which Includes Funding for Things Like… Transportation! (Denverite) Why Amazon Didn’t Chose Denver For its Headquarters, and No, It Wasn’t Because of Our Traffic (Fox31) More Cities Are Adding Vail to Their Flight Lists […]

Tuesday’s Headlines

|
Yes, We Need Money to Fix Transportation Issues. Here’s Where the Democratic Party Plans on Finding it (SUN) The Latest and Greatest on the A-Line Lawsuit, Hint, They Want 80 Million Dollars (CPR) Second Recall for Lime E-Scooters, This Time They “Break in Half” (9News) Glenwood Springs’ CDOT Employee Invented a Modification to Traffic Lights […]