The Legislature Killed Safe Routes to School Funding, So What’s Next?

There's a stark difference between before Safe Routes to School is Implemented and after.  Image: Active Living Research
Nationally, schools that participate in Safe Routes to School programs for multiple years see significantly higher rates of biking and walking to school. Image: Active Living Research

Pay raises for Colorado legislators, electronic traffic enforcement and student testing dominated state politics in the last session, overshadowing the casualty of a longstanding and successful program: Safe Routes to School. Some state funding remains for the 2015-2016 school year, but none for Denver. And after next year, no Colorado schools will have Safe Routes programs unless new funding is identified.

Safe Routes to School is a grant program that promotes biking and walking to school. Nationally, the share of kids in kindergarten through eighth grade who walk or bike to school fell from 47 percent in 1969 to just 13 percent in 2009, according to Active Living Research. In Colorado, where childhood obesity is rising even faster than the rest of the country and one in four kids is overweight, reversing this trend could yield major improvements in public health.

At College View Elementary in southwest Denver, the Safe Routes to School program included workshops on how to ride bikes and bike maintenance. Planners also surveyed the neighborhood and outlined the safest routes to take to and from the school, which is a high-risk area for walkers, according to the city’s Safe Routes coordinator Ashley Fredrick.

About 200 students began walking or biking to school after the program started up in 2005, compared with “barely any” before, said Fredrick.

Jennifer Gonzalez, a physical education teacher who coordinated the Safe Routes program at College View, said losing it would be a big step backward. “I think it’s just really important for students to have a connection to physical activity,” she said. “[Adults] don’t have the most positive views of physical [activity]… and I want to extend that knowledge to parents — let them know their kids can be safe walking or biking to school.”

In the last two years, Denver has doubled school participation in the program without spending any additional grant money.

Times have changed, but Safe Routes to School is a tactic to increase active transportation and decrease driving. Image: Active Living Research
Safe Routes to School programs are an effort to reverse the precipitous decline in walking and biking to school. Image: Active Living Research

The program works. So what happened?

Republican Senators Owen Hill (El Paso), Ray Scott (Mesa) and Jerry Sonnenberg (Eastern CO) killed the grant program in the Senate State Affairs Committee earlier this month, on the night before National Bike to School Day. In an email to Streetsblog Denver, Hill, whose district has received funding for more than 50 Safe Routes projects, said he wants the program for the children in his district but that “we need to be more creative” in finding funding.

“So many programs like this fail to meet the unique needs of our local communities because we have an antiquated idea that politicians and bureaucrats in Denver should collect money from each community and then administer these programs for the rest of the state,” Hill said. “Unfortunately this often means that good ideas fall victim to big-city politics.”

Actually, the Safe Routes program lets local governments design their own approaches. The Colorado Department of Transportation administers the grants based on applications from localities that tailor their programs to local needs.

The pot of money for Safe Routes is small, but it goes a long way. In its last iteration, statewide budget for Safe Routes will be $700,000, split among 60 schools with 30,000 students. That money is a drop in the bucket compared to, say, the Colorado DOT’s $7.3 million budget for safety education. And it can help save money by reducing the substantial costs of bussing kids to school.

Safe Routes is down but not out. Bicycle Colorado is searching for other ways to fund it, whether it’s through local school districts, private support, or even Congress.

“We’re certainly not giving up because this is something that people in Colorado want, and something that’s proven to work,” said Dan Grunig, executive director of Bicycle Colorado, “so we’ll continue to build support with members and coalition folks.”

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Photos: City of Fort Collins
STREETSBLOG USA

Fort Collins Just Built Five Miles of Bikeway for Less Than $1 Million – Here’s the Trick

|
Fort Collins, Colorado, is the latest city to embrace America’s most underrated type of bike facility. As it works to improve the low-stress biking network in the newer, car-oriented neighborhoods of its northwest, the city of 164,000 has used a tool that can be perfect for quickly, cheaply linking up the biking grid: a neighborhood […]

Today’s Headlines

|
DenPo Editor Under Impression That, Unlike Other Agencies, RTD Fares Should Cover Operation Costs Rail~Volution Attendees Take a G Line Tour — On a Bus (9News) RTD to Aurora Mayor: Do Your Part to Boost R Line Ridership (9News) Good Thing City Leaders Didn’t Plow This Highway Through Lower Downtown in the 70s (Denverite) Light […]

Today’s Headlines

|
Denverites File Injunction to Stop CDOT from Widening I-70 Through Low-Income, Minority Neighborhoods (Denverite) National Rail~Volution Conference “Puts RTD’s System — and Shortcomings — On Display” (DenPo) RTD Asks Feds to Okay A and B Lines Once and For All So It Can Finally Open G Line (CBS4) Hit-and-Runs On the Rise, and Baker Bears […]