Denver Finalizing Blueprints for Future of Transportation, Housing and Parks; Asks for Your Input

A bus on Denver's 16th St mall
Advocates for livable streets would like to see Denver design more streets for pedestrians, bikes and transit, which include elements incorporated on the 16th Street Mall. Photo: RTD.

Will Denver’s streets change to move more people quickly and efficiently—or will they continue to prioritize dangerous, polluting, road-clogging cars?

Last night, the city published new drafts within Denveright, a bundle of five plans that outline the city’s 20-year vision for improving parks, new construction and how it will move a growing population. But Denveright could go Denver-very-wrong if the plans are not explicit about making more room on the streets for walking, biking and transit, say members of the Denver Streets Partnership, a coalition of advocacy groups.

“The problem is dependence on cars,” says Jill Locantore, executive director of Walk Denver and a member of the partnership. “The tradeoff we have to make is to de-prioritize cars.”

This illustration shows potential enhancements to a street under the Denveright plan. Illustration: Denver Community Planning and Development.

Yesterday the city released drafts for three of its five plans for the future, including the Comprehensive Plan 2040, which covers big-picture goals, including mobility enhancements; and the Game Plan for a Healthy City, which focuses on the future of parks and recreation. As the planning process wraps up its public input period later this year, members of the streets partnership will give an especially hard look at another plan, Blueprint Denver.

“This is the driving plan for land use and transportation for the next 20 years, so it has to be bold,” says Piep van Heuven, executive director of Bicycle Colorado, which is also part of the partnership. “It’s what all of the smaller plans are going to point to.”

But the city’s previous draft of Blueprint Denver was far from bold, she says.

Livable streets advocates suggest this transportation pyramid as a model for Denver. Image: Transportation Alternatives.

In a letter to the city last September, the partnership criticized Blueprint Denver’s first draft. It suggested that the city “balance the competing needs for space on streets.” The advocates say that this wording leaves too much room to prolong the city’s car dependency.

“It’s about stating clear priorities rather than continuing to imply that we can balance both car-centric and multi-modal approaches,” says Locantore.

Instead of Blueprint Denver’s muddled talk of “balance,” advocates will be looking at the second draft for more definitive language to clarify how they city will transform its streets. Locantore pointed to a visual aid that does just that, an inverted pyramid that puts pedestrians, bicycles and public transit above cars.

But if the current drafts within Denverright continue in the wrong direction, there’s still time for members of the public to get involved with organizations that promote livable streets or make public comments as individuals. The plans are now on view at public libraries or online at the city’s Denveright page. Comments can be made online or at one of the following drop-in sessions:

  • Ross-University Hills Branch Library, 4310 E. Amherst Ave., January 10, 5-7 p.m.
  • Decker Branch Library, 1501 S. Logan St., January 15, 5-7 p.m.
  • Scheitler Recreation Center, 5031 W. 46th Ave., January 24, 5-7 p.m.
  • Park Hill Branch Library, 4705 Montview Blvd., February 5, 5:30-7:15 p.m.

“This is an exciting time for the city,” says van Heuven. “We have a chance through this public planning process to set a new course, we have an opportunity to make real change.”

  • TakeFive

    And the beat goes on… and on… and on.

    I’ll be curious to see what happens once the Denver City Council gets the plan?

  • Riley Warton

    I don’t know if I can do anythingv I live in the suburbs.

  • Emmeaki

    Why not use light rails or elevated trains that go within the city and not just to the outskirts? NYC, Chicago, and other big cities use trains and they are more efficient than busses.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

The UN secretary general, António Guterres, addresses the closing meeting of the 73rd session of the United Nations general assembly at the UN headquarters on 16 September. Photograph: Xinhua/Rex/Shutterstock

‘We’re Losing the Race’: UN Secretary General Calls Climate Change an ‘Emergency’

|
This story originally appeared in The Guardian. It is republished here as part of Streetsblog’s partnership with Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 300 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story. The UN secretary general says that he is counting on public pressure to compel governments to take much stronger action against what […]
6763903825_426b83089c_b
STREETSBLOG USA

Car-Free Zones Eyed in SF, Elsewhere

|
A string of pedestrian injuries and deaths in San Francisco’s Tenderloin district has spurred city leaders to demand a ban on cars in some densely populated neighborhoods — the latest in a nascent and long-overdue move by activists nationwide to get reckless drivers off at least a tiny handful of city streets. San Francisco Supervisor […]
A Comcast Xfinity van tips over within eyeshot of where cyclist Alexis Bounds was killed July 24. Photo: Anonymous

Wednesday’s Headlines

|
Dangerous place: A photo shows an Xfinity van rolling over near the ghost bike placed in remembrance of Alexis Bounds. Input sought for Front Range Passenger Rail. The five options CDOT is considering to upgrade I-25 in Denver. More headlines ...