What the Public Needs From an RTD Transit Pass

Available passes don't reach residents with low incomes, many of whom — students in particular — depend on transit.

Photo: David Sachs
Photo: David Sachs

RTD and a cadre of transit advocates continued their quest to get the agency’s bus and rail passes into more people’s hands yesterday in Park Hill, the second gathering of what will be a year-long effort.

Right now, most RTD passes award discounts for being affiliated with institutions — like the EcoPass, which caters to big businesses, or the CollegePass, which helps college students cover transit fares.

Transit benefits are a good way to generate ridership, but RTD’s current setup is “oriented towards affluence,” as one advocate put it. The available passes don’t reach low-income residents, many of whom are transit-dependent, particularly students.

“Education is a gift,” said Miguel Aguerre, a high school student at DSST Cole, who spoke at the working group Tuesday. “And when that gift is jeopardized by simple things like how you’re gonna get there, it shows the true colors of modern-day society.”

Aguerre lives in Montbello, about nine miles away from his school. He qualifies for a free bus pass paid for by Denver Public Schools. But some of his peers have to pay $66 a month to get to and from school, he said. “I don’t know about other kids, but for me, I never really received an allowance,” he said.

Denver has “school choice,” meaning parents can opt to send their kids to schools in other neighborhoods. Yet DPS doesn’t have comprehensive yellow bus service — just partial coverage with a service called “Success Express.” DPS purchases about 2,500 RTD passes for high school students monthly, according to Chalkbeat, but the school system has 92,000 kids.

The working group is keeping every option on the table, at least for now. For instance, members will research how much a free pass for every Denver resident under 18 would cost. The big question is — and this is a question for any pass the group comes up with — who would pay for it. DPS? The city’s general fund? RTD?

Moving young people around the region without breaking the bank was a theme of yesterday’s public input session. Sharon Battle, a church pastor, has three kids. She said more accessible transit would help them immensely.

“I’m concerned about cost of transportation for students in my home and in my community,” she said. “I’m concerned about not being able to get a low-cost EcoPass, something that companies get. I want [my kids] to be able to go to rec centers, libraries, and other community programs.”

For Battle, access to transit is also a safety issue. She doesn’t want her son driving yet, even though he’s old enough.

“When I say safety, what I mean by that is, I know that [my son] can get transportation with RTD and isn’t picking up a ride from someone else,” she said. “And I don’t necessarily want him to be driving these places himself, because he’s a young African-American man in our community. I’m not ready for him to drive yet.”

The process is just beginning. Expect nine more meetings over the next year before the group makes recommendations to the RTD Board of Directors.

  • TakeFive

    RTD might want to take a look at this: “SamTrans Targets Next Generation of Bus Riders With Youth Mobility Plan” http://sf.streetsblog.org/2017/06/12/samtrans-targets-next-generation-of-bus-riders-with-youth-mobility-plan/

  • ecycled

    RTD. Let’s not study this too long. It’s a valid concern that needs to be addressed with both speed and compassion.

    • TakeFive

      (Assuming you haven’t) Consider reading the piece on Chalkbeat that was linked to above. DPS is really meeting this need waaay better than most places. The advantage of the Success Express is it’s designed to deliver kids directly to their “school of choice.”

      That said there’s room for some improvement.

  • TakeFive

    Just for grins I tracked down RTD’s 1st quarter ridership numbers. Bus ridership is down about 4.5% from last year while light rail is down closer to 9%. Go figure. It’s also significantly below their budget numbers but not sure what all went into that.

  • Commentperson47372649

    That last paragraph really drives home how frustratingly slow RTD seems to be when addressing obvious failings. A year of study sounds to me like ‘A year of study, followed by a year for the board to review the recommendation, followed by a year to propose a funding structure, followed by priorities changing with new board members, and nothing good getting done’.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Today’s Headlines

|
Traffic Deaths Fell Slightly Nationally, But Increased in Colorado (DenPo) New Blueprint for City Growth and Transportation Won’t Pretend Neighborhoods Are Static (DenPo) Density Near Transit Means More Places for People to Live and Work (ABC7) Trump’s Infrastructure Plan a “Trojan Horse” to Cripple Environmental Oversight (KGNU) Driver Kills Michael Miller in the Springs, Faces […]

Today’s Headlines

|
South Pearl Neighbors See Apartments as “Threat” to Parking; Zoning Could Require Ground-Floor Uses (Denverite) Planed Tower at 17th and California to Induce Traffic With 780 Parking Stalls (DenPo) Parking Lot Becomes 49 Homes for People Without Housing (Fox31) City Hiring Staff to Marshal Bond-Funded Projects (DenPo) Plan for A Line Delays Next Weekend as […]
From left, Denver Public Works Executive Director Eulois Cleckley, Metro Denver Chamber President Kelly Brough, Seattle City Traffic Engineer Donho Chang, and former Seattle DOT chief Scott Kubly. Photo: Jack Todd/Bicycle Colorado

Denver Can’t Count on Automated Vehicles to Fix Our Busted Transportation System

|
The auto industry probably loves Colorado’s enthusiastic embrace of automated vehicles. But if decision-makers bet on robo-cars as a transportation panacea, to the exclusion of proven urban transportation solutions, they risk repeating past mistakes that hollowed out urban centers and deepened our dependence on cars. We can make our city streets safer and more efficient today […]