RTD Loses Millions on Parking Because State Legislators Wanted It That Way

Building and running parking lots is a bad way for transit agencies to spend money — giving those parking spaces away for free is even worse. But that’s exactly what RTD is required to do by state law [PDF].

Photo: David Sachs
Photo: David Sachs

If RTD charged drivers just $1.50 per day, the agency would raise an extra $8.2 million a year, according to the Colorado Fiscal Institute. Instead, Denver’s only transit agency spends millions to build and operate its parking facilities without charging for most spaces.

Why? In 2006, after FasTracks was approved by voters. State Senator Ron Tupa, of Boulder, introduced legislation forbidding RTD to charge residents for parking. He didn’t think transit riders should have to “pay twice.”

But transit riders do pay for those subsidized parking spots. They pay in the form of worse bus and train service as agency resources get tied up in parking construction and operation instead.

Each parking space in a garage costs about $20,000 to build, RTD Board Member Claudia Folska told the Denver Post. Of the agency’s 77 park-and-rides, 36 are free all the time, for everyone. The other 41 are free for in-district residents for the first 24 hours, cost $2 per day after that, and cost just $4 for people who live outside the station’s district.

The cheaper and more abundant parking is, the more likely a rider will drive solo to access the train station instead of walking, biking, taking the bus, or carpooling, according to the American Public Transportation Association. By mandating free parking, the legislature actually encouraged car traffic.

RTD isn’t blameless here. The agency wasn’t required to build so much parking by rail stops and doesn’t have to market its stations along the A-Line to Denver International Airport as a cheap place to store cars while out of town. There is no law that ties the agency’s hands and prevents it from developing or selling land by rail stops (though for federally-funded projects, the agency would have to show that ridership would not take a hit as a result).

But it’s clear that the legislature has made the situation worse. The attempt to help people save money on parking actually shifted costs to transit riders who can least afford it.

This article was changed to reflect the correct parking fees for out of district residents at some stations.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Thursdays Headlines 4/8/21: Amtrak, RTD continue to consider more train service to Denver

|
Denver, RTD, and the Metro Area RTD to update study about possible FasTracks peak passenger train service to Longmont (Times-Call, trains.com) DRCOG Transportation Advisory Committee Notes (DRMAC) Amtrak announces plans to add service route connecting Cheyenne to the Front Range route (Post Independent) Denver Air Quality Index: 9 a.m.: 49 (Good). Yesterday’s max: 64 (Moderate) […]

Wednesday’s Headlines 4/7/21: It’s National Walking Day and Bill to boost RTD ridership, lower fares moves forward

|
Happy National Walking Day! Here are some 1-hour walks in Denver to get you moving. Denver, RTD, and the Metro Area Colorado House Passes Bill To Boost RTD Ridership, Lower Fares (finally!) (CBS Local) NACTO Announces New Executive Board Leadership with DOTI’s Eulois Cleckley at the helm (NACTO) With An Eye On Federal Money, RTD To Restart […]