The Denver Post Cheers for a Car-Choked Future

1024px-I-80_Eastshore_Fwy
If Colorado DOT gets its way, I-70 will resemble this 10-lane freeway in California’s East Bay — at first. Eventually part of I-70 will be 12 lanes wide. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Some people think widening highways is just an inherently good idea — the more space for traffic, the better. Count the Denver Post in that camp. The Post recently threw its wholehearted support behind widening I-70 by four lanes.

Believing that wider highways will fix traffic problems is like believing that loosening your belt will fix your waistline. We have tons of evidence that creating more room for cars actually makes traffic worse in the long run.

In the piece, the Post doesn’t mention the outdated, ludicrous traffic projections that CDOT used to justify the widening. The paper also writes off younger generations’ preference to drive less as something that only “sounds plausible on the surface.”

The Post’s whole argument boils down to the idea that I-70 should be widened because no opportunity to widen a highway should go to waste:

Now, it’s absolutely true that you can’t build your way out of congestion in metro Denver or indeed on much of the Front Range because of constraints of land and money. Smart transportation policy must be based on other strategies. But that doesn’t mean when the opportunity presents itself to add capacity to a major highway that has to be reconstructed anyway — in this case because of a structurally deficient viaduct — that the state shouldn’t seize the opportunity to address capacity.

That’s especially true in a metro area that continues to add residents at a fast clip.

Sure, if you want Denver to grow into a traffic-choked monument to car dependence like Houston or LA, by all means widening I-70 is the way to go. Why stop there? If only Colorado DOT had endless money and space, the agency could build highways on top of highways!

But there’s a reason that Houston’s mayor wants to stop widening highways, and LA is moving forward with a “Mobility Plan” that calls for repurposing street space from cars to transit and bikes. They eventually came to the realization that adding traffic lanes was making it harder for other modes of transportation to succeed. More car traffic slows down transit and makes fewer people want to bike or walk.

It has yet to dawn on the Post, apparently, that bigger highways are an obstacle to smart transportation policy.

  • Chris

    The Denver Post are writers not urban planners. Can you blame them for not fully understanding the issues before writing the story? Even though that is their job, they probably only know that roads are good and if they’re wider they’re even better.

    • Charles Buscemi

      i would counter that as the local “paper of record” its entirely reasonable for these idiots to spend 10 minutes googling urban planning/induced demand/etc etc and see that this I-70 widening wont help, long term.

      they could even just look at I-25 post trex for evidence.

  • John Riecke

    Chris, you have a point but as the paper of record I feel it should be their responsibility to do some research before posting pieces that involve the state spending over a billion dollars.

  • The Overhead Wire
  • JimmyO

    What a load! When the population is rising as fast as Denver’s, we need to widen freeways! I’m not saying 10 lanes in each direction, but 4 or 5 will suffice for a metro area of this size.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Thursday’s Headlines

|
Yesterday members of the Colorado House Transportation Committee killed HB1099, a bill that would have banned automated traffic enforcement statewide, including photo red light cameras. Top photo: After a legislative victory, members of the Denver Streets Partnership posed for a photo outside of the State Capitol: Jack Todd and Piep van Heuven of Bicycle Colorado, Jill […]
Pullquote: Denver’s disappearing green spaces are not “because of a growing population of people. It’s because of a growing population of cars.” —Alana Miller, Frontier Group

Wednesday’s Headlines

|
From Streetsblog Fact check: Colo. Rep. Jovan Melton wants to ban red light cameras. But he justifies his position with false info. A hearing for his bill will happen at the State Capitol this afternoon. (Streetsblog Denver) Opinion: Denver paved over paradise and put up a parking lot. Contrary to the conclusion of a recent Denver […]
A parking lot across the street from Union Station, Denver's transit hub. Photo: David Sachs

Opinion: Denver Paved Over Paradise and Put up a Parking Lot

|
As the population grows, “nearly half the land in Denver’s city limits is now paved or built over,” shrinking the city's green space, according to a recent series in Denver Post. But there’s something important missing in their account. The city’s pavement problem isn’t because of a growing population of people. It’s because of a growing population of cars. It’s the roads, driveways and – perhaps most egregiously – the parking lots we’ve built to accommodate more cars.