Skip to content

Walkable Development Near Transit to Have More Room for Cars Than Beds

Greystar, a developer out of Charleston, South Carolina, wants to build a 14-story apartment tower across the street from Denver’s most important transit hub. With a name like Ascent at Union Station, you’d think its builders would reach for high standards, but you’d be wrong. That’s because the developers have baked almost two parking spaces per unit … Continued
Screen Shot 2015-12-21 at 3.38.56 PM
If this thing is built with two parking spaces per unit, there will be a lot more than one car on the street. Image via Denver Planning Board

Greystar, a developer out of Charleston, South Carolina, wants to build a 14-story apartment tower across the street from Denver’s most important transit hub. With a name like Ascent at Union Station, you’d think its builders would reach for high standards, but you’d be wrong.

That’s because the developers have baked almost two parking spaces per unit into the initial design — and more than one parking space per bedroom. At 19th and Wewatta. A one-minute walk from Union Station. In a planning zone with no parking minimum.

When fully built out, this area should be one of the most walkable places in Colorado. Building a lot of space to store cars will do the opposite: Encourage conflicts with people walking and biking, and generate traffic to discourage walking, biking, and transit.

Ken Schroeppel of DenverInfill compared Ascent with other new developments today. Writes Schroeppel:

For comparison, let’s take a look at the parking ratios of some of the other residential developments in the Union Station area. Please note: parking spaces dedicated to retail uses are not included in the totals below.

  • Platform: 243 parking spaces, 287 residential units, ratio = 0.85
  • Cadence: 216 parking spaces, 220 residential units, ratio = 0.98
  • 1709 Chestnut: 537 parking spaces, 510 residential units, ratio = 1.05
  • Pivot (17W): 670 parking spaces, 580 residential units, ratio = 1.16
  • Elan Union Station: 469 parking spaces, 314 residential units, ratio = 1.49
  • Alta City House: 460 parking spaces, 280 residential units, ratio = 1.64
  • Ascent Union Station: 270 parking spaces, 142 residential units, ratio = 1.90

Not only is Ascent Union Station’s proposed parking ratio significantly higher than any of its neighbors, including its sister property Elan Union Station, but it is significantly higher than other downtown apartment projects that don’t have the benefit of being located directly across the street from the region’s largest transit hub. For example, the parking ratio for One City Block = 1.23, Broadstone RiNo = 1.35, and SkyHouse Denver = 1.36.

The three primary defining characteristics of great urban spaces and downtowns in particular are density, mixed uses, and a pedestrian-prioritized public realm. Incorporating such a high number of vehicle parking spaces into a project located in what is arguably the most pedestrian/transit-focused place in the entire region is bad urbanism. I hope Greystar will reconsider their parking plans for Ascent Union Station.

Schroeppel analyzed the number of park spots per bedrooms as well:

  • Platform: 216 studio/1-br units, 71 2-br units, 358 total br, spaces/br ratio = 0.67
  • Cadence: 181 studio/1-br units, 39 2-br units, 259 total br, spaces/br ratio = 0.83
  • Pivot (17W): 445 studio/1-br units, 135 2-br units, 715 total br, spaces/br ratio = 0.94
  • Alta City House: 185 studio/1-br units, 90 2-br units, 6 3-br units, 383 total br, spaces/br ratio = 1.18
  • Ascent Union Station: 41 studio/1-br units, 87 2-br units, 14 3-br units, 257 total br, spaces/br ratio = 1.05

Schroeppel suggests nixing 68 parking spots that take up the entire second floor and replacing them with 13 residential units. If Greystar does change its course, it would have to be on its own accord. The conceptual design cleared the Denver Planning Board last week.

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

Comments are closed.

More from Streetsblog Denver

Farewell to Streetsblog Denver in five commentaries

January 31, 2022

Commentary: Death of the perfect bike lane

January 31, 2022

Commentary: Sidewalks will carry you wherever I go

January 31, 2022

Commentary: In Streetsblog Denver’s absence, local news has a responsibility to get out from behind the windshield

January 31, 2022

Commentary: Becoming a bike advocate and how Streetsblog Denver helped me find community

January 31, 2022
See all posts