Actually, Cheaper Parking at RTD Stations Will Hurt Ridership

Image: David Sachs

The Aurora Sentinel published an editorial yesterday that missed the point on parking rates at RTD stations. The Sentinel claimed that charging $3 to park at Iliff Station will make transit inaccessible to lower income residents, which in turn will diminish ridership:

Redrawn zones mean that if you board Aurora’s R Line at the Iliff station, a round-trip ticket will cost about $9, without discounts. Now add $3 parking to that price, and the city is doing two things: They’re making parking and riding light rail downtown a luxury for many Aurora commuters. That’s wrong. Mass transit is not and should never be a luxury. It’s created as an affordable way to get people around a congested city, and it must be priced to lure stubborn westerners out of their singly-occupied cars.

The city and RTD could easily diminish ridership, or restrict ridership solely to wealthier commuters, by making bad decisions about parking and ridership rates. So far, it’s not good.

The Sentinel appears to be unaware of two key facts: parking is expensive for RTD to build and maintain, and cheap or free park-and-rides induce more “singly-occupied cars.” If stubborn westerners need to curb their driving habits — and they do — then RTD should price parking higher than $3, not lower.

Screen Shot 2015-07-24 at 2.20.43 PM
Parking at RTD stations is often free, if not inexpensive. Image: RTD

A review by the American Public Transportation Association of Los Angeles’s park-and-ride system might hold some lessons for Denver. As Streetsblog LA reported, APTA found that the cheaper and more abundant parking is, the more likely a rider will drive solo to and from the train station instead of walking, biking, taking the bus, or carpooling. Because parking costs money (the average structured parking spot costs $24,000 to build, according to former UCLA professor Donald Shoup) that fees do not fully recoup, undercharging for parking is effectively a subsidy for driving.

Transit is supposed to build communities where people don’t rely on cars, not encourage more car trips. If cash-strapped RTD charged more for parking at its 30,000 spots, it could use the money to fund better first- and last-mile connections, like frequent bus service and biking and walking infrastructure. This would be more equitable than underpricing parking, since low-income riders are less likely to drive to the train in the first place.

Furthermore, riders who do come in cars would be more likely to carpool to save on parking costs, enabling more people to use the same number of parking spots. Ridership would increase, not decrease, as the Sentinel fears.

Evidence does suggest that RTD is not charging enough for parking. According to the Sentinel, parking at the nearby Nine-Mile Station, one stop further out, is “overcrowded.” That means the price should be higher to make sure the parking is efficiently used.

It also makes sense to charge more for parking at stations closer to the city center. Otherwise, there would be an incentive for suburban motorists to drive down the highway, passing station after station, before arriving at one a few stops from downtown. They could park for a buck or two and hop on the train for a few stops.

A $9 round trip fare isn’t cheap, but RTD is working with advocates on a fare structure that would cut prices in half for many low-income residents. That needs to happen. So do higher parking rates at park-and-ride stations so RTD can fund better connections to its transit nodes. The Sentinel is right that transit shouldn’t be a luxury, but by charging the right price for parking, RTD would make transit more accessible, not less.

  • Anthony

    It’s worth mentioning that the Iliff garage is being built and paid for by the City of Aurora rather than RTD. RTD isn’t suddenly changing their approach to P&R pricing.

  • TTIP

    Charging for parking will actually reduce the ridership. If I have to pay to take a bus or train, and then parking on top of that, what encouragement do I have to NOT just drive? The 225 line is already going to be in trouble, as I seriously doubt they will hit their projected ridership. Just like the West Line…just like Bustang (don’t get me started).

  • David Octavius

    Charge MORE for parking? Go to hell. It already costs $171/mo for a pass to the airport. Not to mention parking at the airport if you’re an employee is cheaper than the cost to park at some of these stations, especially the Iliff garage. They want $50/mo to park or $3/day, and they don’t even honor the RTD’s “first 24 hours free if you live in an RTD zone” policy which is bullshit. Parking at the airport for employees (many of which USE the RTD to get to work) is $36/mo (roughly $1.2/day). Why should the 2 story garage on Iliff cost double that?

  • Cathy

    This is so sad! I might as well drive downtown! What it cost me in parking and fare I can pay $2 less to drive! What ever happened to free parking? If the city paid for this then it’s double dipping on residents right? Don’t we pay taxes for crap like this? I’m so tired of always turning around to find out someone from CA and their $$ grabbing schemes have come to CO with their big greed ideas! Colorado natives are being forced out by the elite BS coming from CA and NY! You suck, I’ll drive! How’s that for encouragement?

    • Anthony

      Sorry Cathy, there is no such thing as free parking. The money used to build the Iliff garage was bonded off the expected revenue from the parking fees. Without that, they couldn’t have built it, nor would they have spent the taxpayer money to build it. By paying for the parking at Iliff, you’re paying the actual construction and operations cost it cost the city to build that garage. Parking costs money to provide, and in this case the city is using a libertarian approach to have the people actually using the service to pay for it rather than spreading the cost over all residents to serve the <300 who use it each day.


Today’s Headlines

Lawmakers Argue Over What Highway-Focused Transpo Bill Without Tax Hike Would Fund (Politics) Will the Past Hinder a Larimer Square Future with Walkable Alleys, Affordable Homes, Density Near Transit? (DBJ) Lawmakers Deny Bill of Rights for People Living on Streets — Again (Denverite) City Buys, Takes Land for Sprawling National Western Center Development (ABC7) Friends […]

Today’s Headlines

Despite National Rep, Denver Isn’t Truly Walkable or Bikeable (Confluence) I-70 Widening Prompts Car-Oriented Industrial Development (DenPo) City Reviewing “Cell Poles” to Ensure Clear Paths for People Walking, Using Wheelchairs (Denverite) Louisville Neighbors Get Road Diets on Speedy Streets (ABC7) State Patrol Blames Cyclist for His Death Near Boulder; No Charges for Driver (Camera) Aurora […]