CDOT Considering Charging Drivers by the Mile

Yesterday on Colorado Public Radio, Colorado Department of Transportation Director Shailen Bhatt revealed that the state agency is looking into a mileage-based user fee to fund road projects.

Shailen Bhatt
Shailen Bhatt

Bhatt told CPR’s Ryan Warner that Colorado is part of a “coalition” of states considering the funding mechanism, which charges drivers based on how much they use roads.

From the interview:

We’re absolutely working with states like Oregon who have taken a real pioneering role in this area. There is a coalition of western states to see what is possible, so I think it’s on the horizon. It’s not something we’re going to do immediately.

The fee, also called a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) fee, would help counteract the declining purchasing power of the federal gas tax, which has been pegged at 18.4 cents per gallon for more than 20 years.

The VMT fee could help Colorado make ends meet financially, Bhatt said. But a fee that charges drivers by the mile is more than a revenue generator. VMT fees lead to “more equitable and efficient use of roadways,” according to a report from the Government Accountability Office. They incentivize the use of transit and carpooling, which makes better use of existing roads, reduces congestion, and should, logically, suppress CDOT’s appetite for highway expansion.

Oregon has led the way by implementing the country’s only VMT fee program for cars and light commercial vehicles. Starting in July, its Road Usage Charge program will charge drivers who opt in 1.5 cents per mile. They’ll still pay federal and local gas taxes at the pump, but Oregon will either refund or charge them the difference between the fuel tax and the VMT rate, depending on their car’s data.

Bhatt called CDOT’s lack of funding the “800 pound gorilla in the room.” For a state DOT that’s expanding I-70 at a cost of almost twice its annual budget, the idea that insufficient funds are the primary problem is tough to swallow. But if VMT fees send a signal to drive less, it will reduce congestion and take away a favorite rationale for highway expansionists to spend gobs of money on bigger highways.

  • mckillio

    Yes, please. Though I would make the small amendment that it should be based on both VMT and the weight of the vehicle.

  • Pingback: Today’s Headlines | Streetsblog Los Angeles()

  • Chris

    I learned and read up about Oregon’s VMT. I like it, but it is confussing. I can opt in for the VMT, but I will get reimbursed at the same time for also purchasing gas? I think that makes things complicated and we need to work on how the average individual will understand it and opt in.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Thursday’s Headlines

|
Denver City Council Proposes New Plan to Create Safer Walkways for People Around Construction Sites (Fox31) RTD Will Still be Doubling the Number of Train Cars on the A-Line, Amid Looming Deadline and Ongoing Problems (Denver7) More on the Plans for CDOT’s Old Home Base (DBJ) An Art Installation is Coming to Federal Boulevard to […]

Wednesday’s Headlines

|
Another Driver, Another Structure Crashed Into- This Time it was an Apartment and a Resident Was Injured (9News) How Denver Streets and Sidewalks Aren’t Set-Up for People to Walk, Bike and Scoot Safely, and What Should be Done About it (Denverite) A Review of the South Monaco Bike Lane, Conclusion: Not Enough Riders (Denver Urbanism) […]

Tuesday’s Headlines

|
Motorist Hit and Killed a Person in a Wheelchair Crossing Colfax in Aurora on Sunday, Fled. And Yes, This Story Just Surfaced to Mainstream News (DenPo) Person Who Was Hit by Driver Yesterday, May Have Been Hit by a Second Driver that Fled (KKTV) “Denver’s Troubles with Commuter Rail a “Perfect Storm” that Threatens A-Line’s […]