Why a Denver Transportation and Mobility Department Should Make Streets Better

A standalone transportation department, separate from DPW, should be able to get more projects done like the 14th Street protected bike lane. Photo: Tracy
 Davis/Twitter
A standalone transportation department, separate from DPW, should be able to get more projects done like the 14th Street protected bike lane. Photo: Tracy Davis/Twitter

When Mayor Michael Hancock announced that Denver would join the ranks of other growing cities like Seattle and Oakland and create a stand-alone transportation department, it may have looked like a mundane bureaucratic matter. But the significance of this change could be profound.

If things work out as envisioned, Denverites will start to see more rapid changes to their streets, and those changes will be bolder than what we’ve come to expect from the Department of Public Works.

Right now, adding a bike lane to Broadway is a multi-year slog, and adding bus lanes to Colfax has been even slower. Putting a dedicated transportation department under its own roof should give the agency chief leading implementation of these projects more clout, via a direct line to the mayor, and streamline planning, operations, and maintenance.

Perhaps most importantly, a Denver DOT should elevate transportation to the first-tier policy priority it should be. The city’s transportation system has deep effects on the economy, housing, and cost of living. There are much more far-reaching decisions to make than how to fix potholes, says Jeffrey Tumlin, who recently oversaw the breakout of Oakland’s DOT from within that city’s public works department.

“If you’re only focusing on the current needs of your current population and not planning for your future populations, when it comes to transport, you’re gonna be in deep trouble,” Tumlin said. “And so that’s one of the reasons why being a strong leader in transport requires significant risk-taking — because you’re always having to anticipate future needs and future changes in order to allow your city and region to thrive.”

Transport directors have to be risk-takers who seize the initiative, he said, whereas public works directors are effective when they “manage by complaint.” Repairing a clogged sewer is an essential government function, but cities have to take on a broader portfolio than upkeep and maintenance if they’re going to build a functional, safe, and efficient transportation system for their residents.

When Tumlin began working in Oakland, he found staff scrambling to appease vocal residents with street fixes. But it turned out that the people who complained most did not represent Oakland’s population as a whole. They were affluent and lived on streets with low crash rates. It wasn’t popular with everyone, including pols looking out for their districts, but Tumlin created a more data-driven protocol. He prioritized safety projects where traffic crashes were claiming the most lives.

Mayor Hancock told Streetsblog that spending via this year’s bond measure and the Denveright planning initiative will go farther if Denver has a separate DOT that’s accountable for implementation.

“We really need to focus,” Hancock said. “We’ve got to elevate our efficacy and effectiveness in implementing strategies. If we’re going to invest the kind of dollars we’re talking about, then we better make sure we’re darn good stewards of it. And by making sure we have a direct line between the mayor and the department, I think we can raise the level of accountability.”

What’s more, advocates for better walking, biking, and transit should be more effective watchdogs with a Denver DOT in place. As the distance shrinks between the mayor and the city’s top transportation policy official, they will have a clearer view of what’s going on, how decisions are made, and where they can use their influence to the greatest effect.

Piep van Heuven has been to countless meetings over the years, both as the head of Bike Denver, and now as the Denver director of Bicycle Colorado. She’s excited about the possibilities that the new DOT will open up.

“We just got closer to the epicenter of where things happen in real time,” van Heuven said. “I think the key is really the connected network, and so the faster the projects roll out, the faster we connect the network, the more we’re gonna reap the dividends and see the change.”

  • TakeFive

    Nice coverage of the topic and potential benefits.

    Since I play the role of the cranky contrarian I’ll bring up (only) one stinker. You point out in your linked article:

    Other cities of similar size to Denver have separate departments in charge of streets. Seattle, Portland, and D.C. all have DOTs that focus entirely on the design and management of streets.

    My go-to source for good news is Bloomberg and Megan McArdle penned a nice summary view of both DC and NYC transportation issues that’s an easy, worthwhile read: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-07-06/the-daunting-cure-for-new-york-and-dc-subway-woes

    DC transit transportation is a yuge mess just short of disaster. In short the cause is from chasing shiny new toys while the existing infrastructure rotted from within due to lack of maintenance. Seems like we’ve had similar discussions of late regarding Denver’s 2017 GO Bonds?

    • TranspoGal

      DDOT and WMATA (the DC region’s transit authority) are two separate entities. The issues with Metro have nothing or little to do with DDOT.

      • TakeFive

        A sample from the linked article:

        These observations are not news to anyone who has followed the saga of the Washington Metro’s decline. So why hasn’t anything changed? Because the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority is run by a dysfunctional regional authority, and has become the forum for gladiatorial combat between Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia. Everyone wants more funding for their area, and to heck with folks who don’t vote in my elections. Everyone also wants their constituents to pay as little as possible of the bill for the services they collectively consume.

        There’s also this: “Metro ridership drops 12 percent; $125 million revenue shortfall projected” http://wtop.com/tracking-metro-24-7/2017/02/metro-ridership-drops-12-percent-125-million-revenue-shortfall-projected/

        • TranspoGal

          WMATA is unique, because DC is unique. Maybe I’m missing your point. What do Metro’s issues have to do with Denver getting a transportation department?

          • TakeFive

            Sorry, read my edited comment. I had to take a phone call after I realized the nvm part.This comment will self-destruct in in 5 minutes.

          • TakeFive

            Now that I have my bearings… you ask a fair question.

            I fully support a separate Transportation and Mobility Department for Denver. The challenges ahead go to expectations and always limited resources.There will be plenty of time ahead to delve into all that but ignoring maintenance needs to fund new toys is not a wise choice.

            The Mayor’s vision is to reduce SOV trips. What’s critical will be better transit. While there’s a significant fetish for bike lanes and sidewalks here – and while I’m OK with that they won’t move the needle much with respect to SOV trips. Better transit planned and funded by Denver will quickly bump up against limited resources and allocation priorities including affordable housing, for example. At some point Denver will need to partner with the metro area since the power of that funding is magnitudes higher. No different from what Seattle has done as a city and what passing ST3 will do as a metro.

  • Michael MacLauchlan

    With improved transport goals. I’m hoping Denver is considering removing as many cars as possible. Perhaps by implementing PTR: Here is one example of many (future) systems http://www.overtransit.com/ We will need to ensure safety and respect for the shared property. Any automobile alternative will need to be faster and cheaper then owning a car or maintaining streets vs overhead or other tracks…. More info at https://www.facebook.com/groups/Personal.Rapid.Transit/

  • Michael MacLauchlan

    Another PRT concept:

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Today’s Headlines

|
“Widening I-70 Is a Social Injustice. It’s Also Poor Urban Planning.” (DenPo) State Sen. Ray Scott Floats Bike Tax With No Discernible Goal for Transportation System (Politics) …And the Gazette Is Quick to Worship the Idea, Claiming “Cyclists Demand More Pavement” High Construction Costs May Dampen Bond-Funded Projects (Denverite) Golf Course Near 40th and Colorado […]
Elyria, Swansea, and Globeville residents speak out against the widening of I-70. They wore bandannas to symbolize the air pollution the project will cause. Photo: David Sachs

Denver Post Regurgitates Colorado DOT’s Talking Points on I-70

|
To have the Post tell it, widening an interstate through city neighborhoods is actually a community connector, a jobs program, an affordable housing solution, an investment in our children, and a boon for outdoor recreation. That must be why so many cities are solving their problems these days by spending billions of dollars on traffic-generating, sprawl-inducing highway expansion projects.

Today’s Headlines

|
Globeville, Elyria, Swansea Residents Organize to Prevent Future Displacement (Denverite) 350 Homes Coming to Colorado Station (DBJ) When Streetcar Lines Cris-Crossed Denver (9News) 9News Public Shaming Results in Replacement of Makeshift Aurora Bus Bench Denver “Risks Becoming a Hub of Transitory Apartment Dwellers”(DenPo) Huge Music Festival Would Have Shuttle System, Bike Valet, if Council Approves […]