Denver Business Journal’s Westergaard: Bikeable Streets Are Hostile to Cars

https://www.flickr.com/photos/xerostomia/1362357325/in/photolist-35ornp-ccfpb9-xtXb2h-5hRKqL-wGsGvk-4mkNwo-qe7mKZ-ddnCrR-ddnC3W-pR5J4q-ovWpP8-ouqrR2-ebB34C-coUuU1-oSrBio-dURkNG-yrAEB6-yq3rZJ-yqQo1c-vSdAEq-yoyqas-xtYP9F-ypWPk1-y9di6A-yrzKfr-yqYPxD-pipbzy-xtRzWo-y9kVyv-xtXyrY-y9n1bf-aw87Z9-94UQkA-ddnBrR-6bTDWE-e136DZ-9simpQ-qe7gqk-4aGvwv-8pTaee-yq3MGQ-y9f9jU-xtYWgr-yqSMCZ-xtRh37-yoybX5-xtRimE-96ChAs-96yJ26-3jBNSZ
Making streets safer with bike lanes is apparently part of an elitist plan to help Denver manage its growth. Photo: Rob! via Flickr

Denver Business Journal editor Neil Westergaard has gone all in on his war against people on bikes — traffic congestion and local businesses be damned.

Today Westergaard published his latest rant, which calls the city’s plan to make biking safer “vehicle-hostile” and paints people who want a convenient way from A to B as “fanatics” who think they’re “morally superior.” This latest gem comes from the same guy who whiffed on the basic economics of parking and who believes bicycle infrastructure is a conspiracy against drivers.

Writes Westergaard:

In case you missed it, the city of Denver and the state of Colorado are jumping on the bicycle bandwagon in a big way. It’s an active movement that’s been going on for years in the city, advanced by city planners and bicycle advocates, to move people out of their cars and pickup trucks and onto two wheels as quickly as possible for the good of the earth and all humankind.

The most devout of the bicycle acolytes argue that putting in more protected bicycle lanes, at the expense of motorized-vehicle lanes, will actually reduce overall traffic congestion. Their reasoning? When cities make bicycling safer, more people will choose to get around on two wheels instead of by automobile, thus reducing the number of cars on the road.

Westergaard mocks that idea, citing Boulder’s Folsom Street protected bike lane experiment. But that experiment didn’t fail — it didn’t even have enough time to fail. The City Council caved to complaints 10 months early, before significant traffic data could be collected.

On the other hand, the Denver Business Journal publishes an article nearly every day about the city’s rapid growth. Five hundred new apartments here. The rise of Millennials there. But you have to wonder if Westergaard understands what will happen if the city keeps growing without adding transportation options to its streets. It will choke — like Los Angeles — and traffic will be worse than it is now.

More from Westergaard’s piece, this time about the protected bike lane planned for Broadway:

Forcing bike lanes onto one of the most heavily traveled thoroughfares in Denver is not just being friendly to bicycles. It’s being vehicle-hostile and totally unnecessary, in my opinion.

There are plenty of routes upon which protected bike lanes can and should be established that wouldn’t stick it to people who choose to drive. But the bike fanatics won’t hear of it. They view protected bike lanes on established automobile thoroughfares as an inalienable right and morally superior to driving — many of them believe — because it doesn’t require the burning of fossil fuels.

Westergaard’s own publication reported that Millennials, the fastest growing age demographic in Colorado, prefer not to drive to work. Yet he uses the term “established automobile thoroughfares” as if streets shouldn’t change with the times.

Any credibility he had ends with the premise that streets belong to any one type of traveler. Streets are public spaces that belong to everybody. They’re not about who that space is for, but how that space is used, and Broadway is used as a one-dimensional speedway for motorists leaving the city. The street marginalizes the people who use it as a connection to transit, families who live there, consumers who spend money there, and the businesses they support.

Speaking of business, is the leader of Denver’s preeminent business publication up to date on how making streets more appealing for people outside of cars helps commercial streets function better?

Take Larimer Street, where the addition of bike lanes coincided with a huge spike in retail sales. Or Broadway, Westergaard’s favorite example, where the Broadway Merchants Association helped pull off the three-day bike lane demo last month. A survey of 114 people walking or biking by the demo revealed the following:

  • 78 percent said they would spend more money on Broadway if the bike lane were permanent.
  • 68 percent said they would use the bike lane either daily or weekly if it were permanent.
  • 68 percent own cars.

Instead of thinking about Denver’s streets critically, Westergaard pits people who bike against people who drive, even though they’re often one and the same. Our streets are not a cultural battleground as he would have you believe. They’re public spaces that should get everyone where they need to go safely and efficiently. Right now, that’s not happening.

Westergaard’s publication has a significant following, and his column urges readers to email the Denver Public Works project manager to weigh in. Streetsblog Denver suggests the same.

  • Anthony

    I’m starting to lose my patience with this guy. He has a platform and a broad audience, and he uses his megaphone to spread unsubstantiated rhetoric that makes the prevalence of facts and reason incredibly difficult to prevail. If he’s going to “report” in his publication (I understand it’s his opinion page, hence the sarcastic quotes), he needs to come armed with facts rather than placing the burden of proof on all of us who are working desperately to make Denver a better place to live, work, and play for EVERYBODY. As Aylene observed today and you reported on, Denver is spending $24 million to make Quebec more dangerous for people and move more cars faster. Denver supports a $1.8 billion I-70 widening. How in the world is this “car hostile?”

    Westergaard has previously observed that the “rightful” place for bikes are streets like Sherman and Bannock, then comes out swinging saying PBL’s should go on appropriate streets in this diatribe. First, most side streets where people on bikes “belong” have stop signs every 660 feet. He wouldn’t dare support putting a stop sign every block on Broadway and Lincoln, would he? Why does he think people on bikes like stopping 8 times a mile any more than people in cars do? Second, if PBL’s were placed on those streets there’d be no room for people to drive. Nobody wants that, we want a multi-modal city. Third, I was at a conference last week where Carlos Hernandez spoke of the Fort Collins improvements to College Avenue. College Avenue is home to 38% of all retail and 60% of all jobs in the city. I don’t have the data for Broadway or Denver as a whole, but the point is that businesses and jobs are located on major corridors like Broadway; they’re where people need to get to. They’re where people earn and spend their money, and THAT’s why making safe accommodations for all modes on Arterials is important. /end rant

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Today’s Headlines

|
DenPo Editor Under Impression That, Unlike Other Agencies, RTD Fares Should Cover Operation Costs Rail~Volution Attendees Take a G Line Tour — On a Bus (9News) RTD to Aurora Mayor: Do Your Part to Boost R Line Ridership (9News) Good Thing City Leaders Didn’t Plow This Highway Through Lower Downtown in the 70s (Denverite) Light […]

Today’s Headlines

|
Denverites File Injunction to Stop CDOT from Widening I-70 Through Low-Income, Minority Neighborhoods (Denverite) National Rail~Volution Conference “Puts RTD’s System — and Shortcomings — On Display” (DenPo) RTD Asks Feds to Okay A and B Lines Once and For All So It Can Finally Open G Line (CBS4) Hit-and-Runs On the Rise, and Baker Bears […]