North Denver Residents Make CDOT Director Bhatt Answer for I-70 Expansion

Elyria, Swansea, and Globeville residents speak out against the widening of I-70. They wore bandannas to symbolize the air pollution the project will cause. Photo: David Sachs
Elyria, Swansea, and Globeville residents speak out against the widening of I-70. They wore bandannas to symbolize the air pollution the project will cause. Photo: David Sachs

It was supposed to be Colorado DOT’s meeting about its plan to gouge a wider I-70 through Elyria, Swansea, and Globeville. But residents from those neighborhoods would not let CDOT control the message.

Thursday night at Swansea Recreation Center, opponents of the highway expansion took over the open house, wearing black bandanas over their faces to symbolize the additional pollution they’d breathe should CDOT dig a trench in contaminated soil.

“Do what’s moral, not what’s legal!” urged Rey Gz, a member of the Cross Community Coalition that’s fighting the project. CDOT agreed to cancel the scheduled topic and let residents question CDOT Executive Director Shailen Bhatt for the next 90 minutes.

CDOT Executive Director Shailen Bhatt at Thursday's meeting. Photo: David Sachs
CDOT Executive Director Shailen Bhatt at Thursday’s meeting. Photo: David Sachs

Face to face with Bhatt, locals made their case for CDOT to abandon its plan to spend $1.7 billion widening a freeway that has disconnected and polluted neighborhoods since the 1960s. (CDOT says it costs $1.2 billion, but this figure accounts only for “phase one.”)

More lanes induce traffic, they said. We’re being displaced, they said. Residents already endure higher rates of asthma and cardiovascular disease compared to other parts of the city, they said.

Bhatt ran down the list of mitigations CDOT will pursue — the park that will be built over a small section of the highway trench, payments to residents who will lose their homes. But he never contested the premise that the I-70 expansion is fundamentally harmful.

Instead, he mainly argued that CDOT is following the rules. Environmental concerns are “absolutely grounds for you to tell the Sierra Club or whomever else to sue us on that,” said Bhatt. “I’m doing what is required. We are following federal law, we are following the National Environmental Protection Act.”

Residents want CDOT to complete a comprehensive study of tearing down the current I-70 viaduct, rerouting I-70, and restoring the original street grid to prioritize walking and biking instead of high-speed car trips.

Bhatt insisted the courts would sort things out, and said his agency would not study the reroute unless forced to under the law. Candi CdeBaca, head of the Cross Community Coalition, said another lawsuit was in the works (in addition the one filed last year by the Sierra Club and community members).

Paris Ferribee, a Five Points resident and student at CU Boulder, went head to head with Bhatt. “[Federal approval] doesn’t force you to follow through with the project,” Ferribee said. “It is literally permission, as if I’m getting permission from my mom to go to the club. I have the decision to go or not, but I choose not to because it’s snowing outside.”

Significantly, Colorado Speaker of the House Crisanta Duran, who represents the area, was at the meeting. Duran plays a large role in negotiations over the allocation of CDOT funding, should voters approve a ballot measure in November.

“Perhaps there’s a need for new conversations with Adams County leaders,” Duran said about the reroute option. “We need to organize our roads in a way so it’s not just focused on moving cars down the street, but it’s focused on moving people, and that we’re combating air pollution, and that we’re combating climate change, and that we’re coming up with a variety of different options for everyone who lives here to make sure that our community continues to be a great place to live and raise a family.”

Photo: David Sachs
Photo: David Sachs

Protesters were galvanized by a Denver Post article published the same day that said their neighborhoods comprise the most polluted ZIP code in the country. They also scoffed at what they called a condescending letter posted by Bhatt on Facebook, along with a cheery video about the project. In the statement, he claims the opposition consisted of “a small group of about 60-70 people.”

The Ditch the I-70 Ditch Facebook page, which has been instrumental in the movement against the I-70 widening, has 3,428 members. “I don’t know any of my neighbors that support this project,” said Elyria resident Drew Dutcher. “Many are opposed, but most have just given up.” Just one person spoke in favor of the project Thursday night.

“They are selecting the private contractor for this project right now, and whichever contractor gets the deal, they better be prepared to lose time, money, and credibility because we are here to resist by any means necessary,” CdeBaca said.

  • TakeFive

    One question that hasn’t been answered is why all the new-found love for the poor Hispanics in the Elyria, Swansea, and Globeville neighborhoods….

    Quoting Crisanta Duran – the 1st Latino Speaker of the House – which wasn’t included above: ““This is a predominantly Latino, low-income neighborhood,” she said. “If we did the reroute, the areas it would go through are equally Latino and low-income. It’s a very tough issue. There is no easy answer.”

    … but apparently the poor Latino residents in Adams County deserve a new 12-lane freeway cutting through their neighborhood? Perhaps this is the reason why Adam’s County has no interest in accommodating Denver’s fantasy?

    • MT

      Maybe neither area needs a 12 lane freeway through it. Maybe we should not be expanding highway capacity and instead focus on less destructive ways to get people and businesses the things they need.

    • Mike McDaniel

      270/76 is going to get a major overhaul soon: Adams County is getting a massive highway regardless.

  • JustJake

    NIMBYs. They get a bad rap when they opppse high density housing, but get applause when they oppose transportation infrastructure? V

    • MT

      Yes, one is beneficial to the city, one is destructive to the city.

      • JustJake

        Thanks for clarifying your hypocrisy.

        • Mike McDaniel

          What is hypocritical about density being good and encouraging driving being bad?

          • JustJake

            The hypocrisy is that, individuals speaking up for what is important in their neighborhood should be respected and applauded, period.

            “Urbanists” may sometimes support the particular ~nimby~ message, as with this highway project, and at other times, oppose, as is frequently the case when a high density project negatively impacts existing neighborhoods. Then ~nimby~ is hurled about as an disparaging insult.

            You can’t have it both ways.

          • MT

            There are some things that are good to have in your back yard, and some things that are bad. I can support the things that are good, and oppose things that are bad. Simple enough for ya?

          • JustJake

            Your vision of good vs. bad. As long as you get your way. Got it.

          • MT

            Sorry, I’m capable of evaluating different situations based on their own merits instead of leaning on a lazy acronym.
            Feel free to disagree on the actual topics, but calling someone a hypocrite for having different opinions about completely different things is not only inaccurate, it makes you kind of a dick.

          • Walter Crunch

            Thank you Trump voter for that incredible English lesson

  • Walter Crunch

    We will look back and regret worshiping drivers instead of people.

  • rockerred

    Did Adams County veto the reroute? Sounds like it here.

  • Bernard Finucane

    This is billions of government waste that won’t do anyone in Colorado any good. It’s just a pointless burden to the taxpayer.

    • TakeFive

      The waste comes from the fact that delay after delay has increased the cost. It this had been built 5 years ago the cost would have been considerably less. It’s critical to so many different segments of the local, regional and state economy. I could make a long list.

      FWIW, this is a copy of what Phoenix/ADOT did over 25 years ago including park deck. It’s no big deal; functions well. I-10, similarly, is part of a critical major Interstate freeway. It separates downtown from midtown. Either side of Central Avenue which includes light rail is seeing developer activity. On the south or downtown side the housing is upscale/high end. On the north side the development is comparable to RiNo with more moderate cost condos and apartments. The market for condos has been VG for both higher end and more moderately priced units.

      • Walter Crunch

        Works well for who?

  • Steve Taylor

    What if the Sierra Club and Ditch the I70 agree to drop all opposition to the project if Bhatt, the entire upper management of CDOT and any CDOT personnel working on the project are required as a condition of continued employment with the State to move their families to the neighborhood BEFORE any construction can begin.


Denver Public Works crews install a protected bike lane on 14th Avenue. Photo: David Sachs

Here Comes the 14th Ave Protected Bike Lane

Denver Public Works crews began installing a protected bike lane on West 14th Avenuee this week, the first new protected bikeway of 2017. It should be ready to ride by next week. The bikeway, which replaces a standard, striped bike lane, will run for a half-mile between Speer Boulevard and  Bannock Street — or about […]

Today’s Headlines

CDOT Poll on I-70 Expansion Loaded With Pro-Highway Propaganda (Westword) Shortage of 120 Bus Drivers Isn’t a Crisis, Swears RTD (Fox31) Broken Wire Interrupts E, F, and H Lines This Morning (Denverite) Denver Has Construction Jobs, But High Rents Keep People from Taking Them (DenPo) Longmont Bike-Share, Pedestrian Underpass Opens (303 Cycling) National headlines at […]