Skip to content

Dennis Gallagher: City and CDOT Rushing to Ram a Wider I-70 Through Denver

Outgoing City Auditor Dennis Gallagher has been a thorn in the side of reckless I-70 expansionists for a long time. When the city council first considered proclaiming support last year, he blasted the 10-lane, $1.8 billion proposal. Before the Denver Regional Council of Governments awarded the project $50 million, he gave a scathing warning. Now Gallagher … Continued

Outgoing City Auditor Dennis Gallagher has been a thorn in the side of reckless I-70 expansionists for a long time. When the city council first considered proclaiming support last year, he blasted the 10-lane, $1.8 billion proposal. Before the Denver Regional Council of Governments awarded the project $50 million, he gave a scathing warning.

Dennis Gallagher
Dennis Gallagher

Now Gallagher is calling out the Colorado Department of Transportation for trying to drive stakes in the ground before the design is finalized, and the City and County of Denver for its acquiescence.

On his blog, Gallagher scolds the city for pursuing an “intergovernmental agreement” with the Colorado Department of Transportation that would “allow the city to actually start work and spend money on the I-70 reconstruction,” even though final designs are at least a year away. Gallagher says the agreement would commit more than $100 million of taxpayer money to begin the process of widening I-70.

From his post:

Frankly I am incensed — though not surprised — at this. The reality is that CDOT and the Denver ‘powers that be’ decided long ago that the so-called preferred alternative (the ten-lane cut and cover) would be what is built despite — and in disregard for — the results of the Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS).

The final version of the EIS won’t be completed until February, according to CDOT. A required approval from the Federal Highway Administration may not come until a year from now, maybe later.

Nevertheless, CDOT continues to portray the project as a done deal. While the highway widening will likely clear the federally mandated process, the sooner CDOT starts building it, the easier it will be to head off opposition, and the less recourse the public will have to stop a road expansion that contradicts basic principles of good city design.

Gallagher gets this:

But we all know that the City and CDOT are in the ‘wink and nod’ mode. The deal is done; it is a fait accompli; the process is a sham; and they don’t care about serious issues and concerns they just need to get on with building their mega-highway.

“Get out of the way, people. You’re blocking the lanes!”

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

Comments are closed.

More from Streetsblog Denver

Farewell to Streetsblog Denver in five commentaries

January 31, 2022

Commentary: Death of the perfect bike lane

January 31, 2022

Commentary: Sidewalks will carry you wherever I go

January 31, 2022

Commentary: In Streetsblog Denver’s absence, local news has a responsibility to get out from behind the windshield

January 31, 2022

Commentary: Becoming a bike advocate and how Streetsblog Denver helped me find community

January 31, 2022
See all posts